An alkaline yellow dye liquor at pH above 8. Only two reagents were needed — 25 kg/t of compound decolorant followed by 15 g/t anionic PAM. After 2–3 minutes the supernatant was transparent and colourless, the cleanest result in this series.
Raw yellow dye liquor (left) beside two treated beakers. The colour has transferred into the settled floc bed, leaving the water phase clear.
This sample is a different problem from a dilute rinse water. It is a concentrated liquor, and that changes what the treatment has to achieve:
Reagent consumption tracks the mass of colour present, not the volume of water. A concentrated liquor consumes reagent in proportion — here, kilograms per tonne.
At pH above 8 the charge behaviour of both the colour bodies and the reagents shifts. A programme tuned at neutral pH will not transfer unchanged.
Pale shades are unforgiving. Residual haze or fine carry-over that would pass unnoticed in a dark effluent is plainly visible here.
With only two dosing points, each has to be right. There is no third reagent to compensate for an error in the first.
The objective was set higher than usual for this sample: not merely lighter, but colourless.
Two moves. A compound decolorant does the chemical work; a small polymer dose makes the result separable.
| Step | Action | Dosage / Setpoint | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dose compound decolorant | 25 kg/t | Breaks the colour through several mechanisms at once. A compound formulation is used here rather than a single-mechanism decolorant because the liquor is concentrated and alkaline. |
| 2 | Dose anionic PAM | 15 g/t | Agglomerates the fine particles into large, dense flocs and strengthens solid–liquid separation. |
Concentrated yellow-amber liquor, alkaline at pH above 8.
The colour breaks and transfers out of solution as the chromophores are destabilised.
Fine particles agglomerate into large, dense flocs.
A thick pale floc bed collects at the base of the beaker and the supernatant above it is transparent and colourless.
Two dosing steps and 2–3 minutes of settling produced a transparent, colourless supernatant with the colour fully transferred into a dense floc bed. Total chemical input: 25 kg/t compound decolorant plus 15 g/t anionic PAM. Of the eight samples in this laboratory series, this was the only one to reach a genuinely colourless finish.
The outcome most dye effluents fail to reach. No residual tint in the water phase.
The simplest programme in this series. Fewer control points, less that can go wrong.
The programme worked on the raw alkaline liquor as received — no acid or caustic step.
Sharp separation between the settled solids and the water phase, which helps downstream dewatering.
| Treated Flow | Compound Decolorant @ 25 kg/t |
Anionic PAM @ 15 g/t |
|---|---|---|
| 10 m³ / day | 250 kg / day | 150 g / day |
| 50 m³ / day | 1250 kg / day | 750 g / day |
| 100 m³ / day | 2500 kg / day | 1.5 kg / day |
| 500 m³ / day | 12500 kg / day | 7.5 kg / day |
The same logic transfers to other strongly coloured industrial effluents. The chemistry is the same; the dosage and the decolorant grade change with the water.
It is high, and it reflects a concentrated liquor rather than a dilute rinse stream. Where feasible, segregating and treating a concentrated liquor separately is more economical than diluting it into the main flow and then treating a much larger volume.
It may lighten the liquor, but reaching genuinely colourless is what the compound formulation is for. If your target is a colour limit rather than a visual standard, a jar test on your own water will settle which grade is justified.
The compound decolorant used here tolerates the alkaline condition of this liquor. That is specific to this water — do not assume it transfers to a different effluent without testing.
You get a lighter liquor rather than a colourless one, and the residual colour will not clear no matter how much polymer follows. The decolorant sets the ceiling on what is achievable; the polymer only makes it separable.
The floc bed is visibly substantial — expect meaningful sludge volume at this dosage. Sludge yield was not quantified in this test; factor dewatering into your budget.
Yes. Send a sample and your target discharge standard and we will run the same procedure and report the dosage.
Tell us your industry, daily flow and target discharge standard. Our laboratory will run a bench-scale trial on your own sample and report the exact chemical and dosage.
| Product | Role in This Case | Dosage |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Water Decoloring Agent | Multi-mechanism colour breaking | 25 kg/t |
| Anionic Polyacrylamide (APAM) | Floc agglomeration and settling | 15 g/t |
An alkaline yellow dye liquor at pH above 8. Only two reagents were needed — 25 kg/t of compound decolorant followed by 15 g/t anionic PAM. After 2–3 minutes the supernatant was transparent and colourless, the cleanest result in this series.
Raw yellow dye liquor (left) beside two treated beakers. The colour has transferred into the settled floc bed, leaving the water phase clear.
This sample is a different problem from a dilute rinse water. It is a concentrated liquor, and that changes what the treatment has to achieve:
Reagent consumption tracks the mass of colour present, not the volume of water. A concentrated liquor consumes reagent in proportion — here, kilograms per tonne.
At pH above 8 the charge behaviour of both the colour bodies and the reagents shifts. A programme tuned at neutral pH will not transfer unchanged.
Pale shades are unforgiving. Residual haze or fine carry-over that would pass unnoticed in a dark effluent is plainly visible here.
With only two dosing points, each has to be right. There is no third reagent to compensate for an error in the first.
The objective was set higher than usual for this sample: not merely lighter, but colourless.
Two moves. A compound decolorant does the chemical work; a small polymer dose makes the result separable.
| Step | Action | Dosage / Setpoint | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dose compound decolorant | 25 kg/t | Breaks the colour through several mechanisms at once. A compound formulation is used here rather than a single-mechanism decolorant because the liquor is concentrated and alkaline. |
| 2 | Dose anionic PAM | 15 g/t | Agglomerates the fine particles into large, dense flocs and strengthens solid–liquid separation. |
Concentrated yellow-amber liquor, alkaline at pH above 8.
The colour breaks and transfers out of solution as the chromophores are destabilised.
Fine particles agglomerate into large, dense flocs.
A thick pale floc bed collects at the base of the beaker and the supernatant above it is transparent and colourless.
Two dosing steps and 2–3 minutes of settling produced a transparent, colourless supernatant with the colour fully transferred into a dense floc bed. Total chemical input: 25 kg/t compound decolorant plus 15 g/t anionic PAM. Of the eight samples in this laboratory series, this was the only one to reach a genuinely colourless finish.
The outcome most dye effluents fail to reach. No residual tint in the water phase.
The simplest programme in this series. Fewer control points, less that can go wrong.
The programme worked on the raw alkaline liquor as received — no acid or caustic step.
Sharp separation between the settled solids and the water phase, which helps downstream dewatering.
| Treated Flow | Compound Decolorant @ 25 kg/t |
Anionic PAM @ 15 g/t |
|---|---|---|
| 10 m³ / day | 250 kg / day | 150 g / day |
| 50 m³ / day | 1250 kg / day | 750 g / day |
| 100 m³ / day | 2500 kg / day | 1.5 kg / day |
| 500 m³ / day | 12500 kg / day | 7.5 kg / day |
The same logic transfers to other strongly coloured industrial effluents. The chemistry is the same; the dosage and the decolorant grade change with the water.
It is high, and it reflects a concentrated liquor rather than a dilute rinse stream. Where feasible, segregating and treating a concentrated liquor separately is more economical than diluting it into the main flow and then treating a much larger volume.
It may lighten the liquor, but reaching genuinely colourless is what the compound formulation is for. If your target is a colour limit rather than a visual standard, a jar test on your own water will settle which grade is justified.
The compound decolorant used here tolerates the alkaline condition of this liquor. That is specific to this water — do not assume it transfers to a different effluent without testing.
You get a lighter liquor rather than a colourless one, and the residual colour will not clear no matter how much polymer follows. The decolorant sets the ceiling on what is achievable; the polymer only makes it separable.
The floc bed is visibly substantial — expect meaningful sludge volume at this dosage. Sludge yield was not quantified in this test; factor dewatering into your budget.
Yes. Send a sample and your target discharge standard and we will run the same procedure and report the dosage.
Tell us your industry, daily flow and target discharge standard. Our laboratory will run a bench-scale trial on your own sample and report the exact chemical and dosage.
| Product | Role in This Case | Dosage |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Water Decoloring Agent | Multi-mechanism colour breaking | 25 kg/t |
| Anionic Polyacrylamide (APAM) | Floc agglomeration and settling | 15 g/t |